This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the country of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.Trinidad and TobagoWikipedia:WikiProject Trinidad and TobagoTemplate:WikiProject Trinidad and TobagoTrinidad and Tobago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I think the title is fine as is. It isn't the only match that ended 2–1 for Trinidad, but it also isn't the only 2018 World Cup qualification match played between Trinidad and the USA. I think it's the best compromise we have right now as it's not too ambiguous but also not too specific. Also, we traditionally don't use "v.", we use "v", and even if we did move back, it could misinterpreted different ways. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 00:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@KingSkyLord, J4lambert, and Puddleglum2.0:, who did earlier moves. Note that if my above proposed title has issues, I would also support a move to basically any other alternative title that doesn't use score-as-disambiguator, e.g. using date or the like instead (October 10, 2017). SnowFire (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.