Talk:Tripidium bengalense
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 58.26.5.70 in topic "Munj" and "munja" as common names
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tripidium bengalense article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Saccharum munja page were merged into Tripidium bengalense. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Accepted name
editI merged some material (poorly referenced) from Saccharum munja, as it is a synonym of this species. The accepted name now seems to be Tripidium bengalense. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
"Munj" and "munja" as common names
editI am not savvy at Wikipedia editing, but Merriam-Webster has "munj" and "munja" as relevant names that I believe belong here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/munj 58.26.5.70 (talk) 16:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)