Talk:Triple bottom line cost–benefit analysis
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 9 May 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved to another name.Article moved
to Triple Bottom Line Cost Benefit Analysis.A redirect is created at TBL-CBA.(non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 17:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) → Triple Bottom Line Cost Benefit Analysis (TBL-CBA) – naming convention for the topic of triple bottom line cost benefit analysis is TBL-CBA. Sources: http://sustainability.autodesk.com/available-solutions/autocase/ and http://www.usgbc.org/education/sessions/making-case-leed-solution-and-new-pilot-credit-10671978 69.158.71.203 (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Move to Triple Bottom Line Cost Benefit Analysis. The abbreviation is not necessary as part of the article title. Station1 (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
I agree Triple Bottom Line Cost Benefit Analysis is a better titleExcess.kurtosis (talk) 12:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Excess.kurtosis
- Move to Triple Bottom Line Cost Benefit Analysis or TBL-CBA. We do not mix full titles and abbreviations. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.