Talk:Trisha Krishnan/Archive 1

Archive 1

Surname

How can her father's name and her mother's surname be Krishnan, when she has said her full name is Trisha Krishnamurthy/Krishnamoorthy? Her surname might have been shortened to Krishnan for convenience but that doesn't really change the fact that her father's name is Krishnamurthy, does it? Why are some people insisting on renaming her parents to "Krishnans" in the "early life" section? Miss p r (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Fan point of view

I feel that whoever wrote this article was biased. Trisha has had her share of hits and flops. But only the hits were mentioned. And the flops were "average grossers"? [redact] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.248.200 (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

So the writer means that trisha was only 15 years old when she acted as a friend of Simran in Jodi? it's ridiculous...

All of her movies in tamil were either flops or below average grosser except Ghilli, Saamy & Thirupaachi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.184.217.86 (talk) 09:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Why is Trisha's caste so prominently mentioned?

In the Wikipedia article "Trisha Krishnan", why is Trisha's caste identity as a Brahmin so prominently mentioned? Can you find any other article about any Indian actress where the caste of the actress is so prominently mentioned? The editor has seen no point in mentioning her religion or mother tongue, so why does the editor make an exception for caste?

I believe the page has been created by someone who wants to promote caste-based divisions and divide Indians.

-Trisha’s caste (Tamil Iyer) has been mentioned on this page merely to give readers a little more information. The caste has not been prominently mentioned, if you see the article it is just slotted in a sentence in a very passive manor. By adding the caste I don’t mean to split the Indian community what so ever. The writer of this comment has very shallow thinking in my opinion. Wikipedia articles are created to enrich knowledge of information seekers. It is only fair that all parties include all relevant information they know about the subject.

-Especially, in Tamil-Nadu (and in India) where caste is so insignificant I too wonder why caste gets mentioned in this page

Absouletly true, no reason to delete the caste due to some shallow minded thinking. Whether we like it or not, what was stated is true. Wikipedia, as mentioned is not to write / modify articles as per ones feelings. Write and defend the facts, let it be bitter or sweet. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. S3000

Is there any citation for her Iyer identity? --Rrjanbiah 17:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Here they are ;

• 1. This quotes 'Today, Trisha Krishnan, a Palakkad Iyer woman.....'
• 2. Transcript of a chat with Trisha where she herself says she's an Iyer--S3000 07:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I have been watching some edits on the fact she's an Iyer by certain users that question the citations I've given. To their information, at least one of the citations above are considered as reliable sources. As most know the Internet Movie Database is a pretty reliable source for such information and it is documented there too! Reading your footnote, why don't you please produce reliable sources that prove otherwise. That will help prove your claim, rather than just writing 'she's not a brahmin'.--S3000 (talk) 15:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Trisha's birth town ?

In the article, the birth place of Trisha has been first mentioned as Chennai, and then in the photo as Palakkad. Could someone please verify and update with correct information? - unni 15:28, 7 July 20010(UTC)

Arrest of Netrikan Editor

Why is the arrest of Netrikan Editor due to a complaint given by this actress (and the related incidents) not mentionedDoctor Bruno 20:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

TIME Magazine India Inc.

Just a note for future editors: the girl on TIME Magazine Asia's story INDIA Inc. is Gunjan Thiagarajah. She and Trisha resemble each other, but ... well. Here's the link: [1]. Best regards, --Plumcouch 09:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Images

We are not permitted to use a film screenshot solely to depict Trisha Krishnan; check the license text. We may use a film screenshot to provide critical commentary about that film, but using a film screenshot simply to depict Krishnan is not acceptable. We either need to replace the image with an acceptable one or remove the image altogether. Much better would be to find a free image but this may be troublesome. --Yamla 19:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

@Meegsy 2600:6C5D:0:333F:A421:6E05:3D86:D8E7 (talk) 12:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

I am removing the newest image for the same reason. Also bear in mind that if we continue to upload restrictively copyrighted images, we are hurting our chances of acquiring a free content image that like the text can be used by anyone, anywhere.

×Meegs 20:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Please can you change the profil picture by a recent one ? S.Sritharan (talk) 11:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

What about her controversies?

Many controversies related to trisha aren't mentioned.Please remember that Wikipedia should be a collection of facts but not biased opinions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.226.74.50 (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC).

If you feel there are any with credible sources, please add them.--S3000 07:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes! an article needs to provide a balanced viewpoint. Moreover the article is from a credible source (Times of India: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/966048.cms) and it in no way publishes its own opinion in this matter. Hence I feel its fair to provide a link to this article, atleast in the external links section.

This is not appropriate for the external links section. It would possibly be appropriate for the main article itself (and then the link used as a reference) if there was any content here. But there just isn't. The video clip appears to be yet another fake and as per WP:BLP, we can't add information we have reason to believe is not accurate. --Yamla 22:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The motive is not to project Trisha Krishnan as the woman in the video. It is just a piece of information which was heavily covered by the media. The source of the article too is one of the most respected newspapers in the country.

If the video is not Trisha Krishnan, it is not relevant here. I also think it is stretching the truth a bit to state that that is one of the most respected newspapers in the country. Please see WP:BLP. We have to be very careful about what we say in a biography of a living person. --Yamla 23:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, so now you begin to question TOI's credibility. Please have a look at wikipedia's own article about TOI before posting any remarks. I dont think it would be the most widely circulated English daily if its credibility were in question. I think you need to check the facts before you prune some article about some random indian actress. TOI definitely is a larger figure in Indian society than trisha krishnan and I'm sure they wouldnt slander some actress just to improve their circulation. Moreover it wasnt only TOI that reported this news. So in that case are you going to question the credibility of the Indian news reporting media ?

It is also unfair to make a personal comment by saying "you are stretching the truth" based on what "you think" i.e your personal opinion, especially since there is a whole lot of evidence to say that the Times of India is one of the most respected newspapers in India. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Times_of_india

There's a whole section in Times of India devoted to how the newspaper is sinking to yellow journalism and that its reputation has taken "such a plunge". In any case, this particular newspaper article essentially states that someone who resembles Krishnan is possibly doing the rounds on the Internet. And what source do they use? Galatta. Please. This is a long way away from WP:BLP. --Yamla 23:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The "whole section" you are referring to has been flagged as "The tone or style of this article or section may not be appropriate for Wikipedia.". How can we possibly justify using something which is not appropriate for Wikipedia itself. I may as well ask what the sources are for the "criticisms". For example some blog discussion http://wethemedia.blogspot.com/2005/11/naughty-naughty-naughty.html has been used as a reference. Isn't it more reasonable to trust Times of india than some blog discussion?.

I have pointed you to WP:BLP. There is nothing more to say. --Yamla 00:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Come on, everybody knows about Trisha's bath video and all the other scandals she's supposed to have been involved in. Whats wrong in adding it in a neutral point of view with credible sources. News articles can be included as citations if we write it was reported that......--S3000 09:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Just so you guys know as you are discussing about Times of India. This would be interesting. Gnanapiti 14:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

the more i read these discussions, the more i think wikipedia is less and less what it claims to be. The media scandal that surrounds this actress is a well-established fact. While the actress has skirted responsibility by denying it is her. Earlier admission makes this denial questionable. That reputed newspapers reported it is another fact.

Clinton is another example of a living celebrity embroiled in previous sex scandals. Are you saying it's neutral POV to NOT report it? The wikipedia article's purpose is not to establish culpability. By reporting this scandal, we are not merely citing tabloids and unfounded rumors but reporting a major event in this celebrity's personal and professional life.

It seems to me however that editors with a bias are hiding behind "neutral POV" and distorting the article to serve their own agenda.

The only difference between the media that covered clinton and the one covering trisha was that it was a western media that broadcasted it for the world whereas trisha is a south indian celebrity who's fame is probably restricted to the indian subcontinent and communities of Overseas indians. So I ask, is there a neutral POV towards mainstream indian media by the editors?

At the very least there should be a link at the bottom of the page to a nes article.

While the morals and personal censorship values of the editors may help them in maintain self-respect. I urge them to uphold a sense of integrity and objectivism and not let bias distort this article. Runehawk 16:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

There's significant reason to believe the woman in the video is not her. Do you have a reliable source that Krishnan admitted it was her? If so, please provide the link. If not, we cannot add it as it would be a blatant violation of WP:BLP. This is completely different from the case with Clinton where the incident in question clearly did take place and has been admitted by all people involved. --Yamla 17:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

The pages of certain politicians too have a section on controversies although they never 'admitted' it. Just 1 example is the George Fernandes article. I never heard him admitting that he was wrong in the Barak SAM scandal, yet its there. There are many more of such articles I've come across. Although Trisha claims that the one in the video isn't her there's no harm in including it, adding that a video 'claiming' to be her bathing was circulated while she was in South Africa filming Thirupaachi... while she claims that it isn't her in the video, being the work of parties who want to defame her. I don't see that being 'a blatant violation of WP:BLP'.--Flexijane (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Why is it said that "There's significant reason to believe the woman in the video is not her" ? What is the "significant reason" ? Is it because she herself said that the one in the video is not her ? In my opinion the issue should be included in the article but in a positive viewpoint just as how others above have suggested. By the way, one may find this write-up interesting. To save time, just check out the topic 'Trisha Krishnan linkups'. I hope you all get whats meant.Automaniaconwiki (talk) 13:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I wonder what's keeping the Wikipedians who oppose including Trisha's controversies from further discussing in this section.--Flexijane (talk) 15:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 20:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Quote

"'Nuvvostanante Nenoddantana' is the best entertainer that I have seen in my life”. This quote was apparently attributed to Trisha in the text here for quite a while, and the quote is presented elsewhere as hers.[2] However, Sifi attributes this to Uma Krishnan.[3] Gimmetrow 17:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

TRISHA IN KANNADA

trisha is made up her entry in sandalwood[kannada film industry].
film is LAGORI,co-star is Puneet Rajkumar,director is Yograj Bhat

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Entertainment/India_Buzz/Trisha_to_act_in_Lagori/articleshow/3129166.cms

http://entertainment.oneindia.in/kannada/top-stories/2008/trisha-puneet-lagori-200608.html

did anyone noticed?

my question is
i think she dont know to speak kannada,then how come she will act in kannada movie?

I am confused.

i don't think so that a actress who knows kannada only should act in kannada movies!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.101.43.139 (talk) 08:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit request

{{editsemiprotected}}

Trisha should be referred as Trisha and not Krishnan, as the article wrongly does.

Clearly, the article was written by someone who does not understand Tamil naming convention. Tamil speaking people (covering all religions and castes) usually do not have surnames. The naming scheme is very simple in Tamil Nadu. A person's name is preceded by what is called an "initial." The initial is the first letter of one's father. In this case as Trisha's father's name is Krishnan, her proper name will be K. Trisha. If the father's name is two words long, say, Krishnan Rajan, then the initials would be K.R. Trisha or just K. Trisha, but not R. Trisha. There is no hard and fast rule or convention when the father's name is two words long.

So Trisha should properly be identified as Trisha and not Krishnan. By calling her Krishnan the writer has made a big mistake.

210.18.49.249 (talk) 08:25, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Seems like a valid point, but this needs to be discussed first before it gets changed. Unless of course, you can find some reliable sources indicating that. --JokerXtreme (talk) 11:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Any decision yet on Trisha Krishnan's name? She should be called Trisha and NOT Krishnan. It is done on the wrong assumption Krishnan is her surname. By doing that, the writer is actually referring to her father Krishnan though he means Trisha. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.150.71 (talk) 08:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Trisha's name in Tamil

Hey guys, I want to ask you something relating to Trisha Krishnan's name in the Tamil script, in this article, it is written like this (ISO transliterations included after the name):

த்ரிஷா கிருஷ்ணன், Triṣā Kiruṣṇaṉ

But in the Tamil Wikipedia, her name is written like this:

திரிசா கிருஷ்ணன், Tiricā Kiruṣṇaṉ

So which is the right spelling? The former or the latter? Can someone clarify? Thanks! =)
Yours faithfully, kotakkasut. 08:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

1) the ஷ is a grantha character and is one of the five grantha characters commonly used to write Tamil. But Ta. Wiki MoS recommends avoiding grantha characters so there we dont use it there. 2)Also in Tamil, Grammatically a word cannot begin with a orrezhuthu like த், so per written tamil grammer a தி has been used (the later pronunciation is also quite common amongst tamil speakers). Even then the Mos isn't enforced uniformly or strictly, as many people don't agree with it. In en wiki, it is not necessary to be a stickler to Tamil grammer, we can use either.--Sodabottle (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Mentioning Caste

Dear Editors!
There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals. Your views if any are welcome there or even here.
And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc.
Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

As the caste information is of a very personal nature it should be treated the same as religious, ehthnic/descent, and sexuality information in biographies (per WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS); that is, a subject's caste should not be included in articles unless it is supported by reliable sources and the person self-identifies as such. I fully support the removal of any caste information not meeting these two requirements and beliveve that BLP policy supports this removal as well. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 16:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Your views at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals would be more welcome as other editors can also comment accordingly. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Not here, please. There is a community discussion taking place at WT:INB and I would advise people to read the entire discussion before forming an opinion because the above summary is incorrect. Nothing more need be said here. - Sitush (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Trisha Krishnan 2010 - still 111343 crop.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Trisha Krishnan 2010 - still 111343 crop.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Trisha Krishnan 2010 - still 111343 crop.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 14 November 2012

Trisha is loved actress in Tamil cinema 91.208.4.26 (talk) 10:51, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm sure she is. However, to request an edit, you need to tell us what you'd like editing, and provide a reliable source for the change. Empty edit requests and short, unencyclopedic statements like this are likely to simply be ignored. Read the welcome message I left on your talk page. Begoon ^talk 12:48, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 29 May 2013

It has been mentioned in this page that Trisha won the Filmfare award for her debut movie Mounam Pesiyadhe. It is not right. She didnt win any filmfare for it. Her first award was for Lesa Lesa (IIFA awards). I request you to kindly correct it in the page! Thanks!! 122.164.144.152 (talk) 12:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - Thanks! --ElHef (Meep?) 13:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

awards

Trisha did win a best filmfare debut actress in Tamil" for "Mounam pesiyadhae". I have certainly seen her on the award ceremony where she bagged the prize.

Please go through the following links:

Mind you, all of the following links can't lie simultaneously for a reason or two. It's really pathetic to see that information being deleted with no concrete evidence to fleck.

https://sites.google.com/site/suthernqueentrisha/

http://www.telugucolours.com/id2-pid819-chT/profile/trisha

http://realentertainar.blogspot.com/

http://actresalbums.blogspot.com/2013/04/trisha-hot-pics.html

Please make sure this information gets added to the award list.

And also she won an "Eikon award 2011 " for best actress.

She won "Kalaimaamani award- 2010" for her service in the cine field along with some other heroines. The following link in Tamil tells it all.

http://tamil.oneindia.in/movies/awards/2007/09/trisha-simbu-navya-recieve-kalaimamani-awards-070902.html

http://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news/may-07-02/11-05-07-kalaimamani-award.html

She also won "cineMAA award 2009" for movie "King" which was also not included. The cineMAA award giving ceremony didn't get staged in 2009 but the winners were announced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinnavar (talk • contribs) 08:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

These were some other awards that were missed out. So please edit the award list with those missed.

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2014

hi hehe

68.146.153.193 (talk) 06:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Be more specific about your request. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2014

|-
| 2014 || ''[[Rajakumar]]'' || || Kannada Debut || Filming

24.6.220.176 (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I assume you meant the remake of Dookudu and added that information. Next time please kindly provide a reference. Thank you --PeaceNT (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

TRISHA SIGN,DHANUSH FILM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.143.62.164 (talk) 07:12, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2014

Trisha's childhood best friend is sujitra singer.

Wikisays (talk) 11:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2015

Need to add this request for Engagement of Trisha Actress Trisha Krishnan and Varun Manian Engagement Ghanshyam.r (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Done Stickee (talk) 10:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2015

"On 23 January 2014 she became engaged to Varun Manian,[87] Indo-Asian News Service. 24 January 2014. Retrieved 27 January 2014.". It is 2015, you fucking assholes! 122.172.27.203 (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Done I love the passion. Cannolis (talk) 14:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2015

Tamilsaint (talk) 03:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

References

Not done: no request Cannolis (talk) 03:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Trisha (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.trisha-krishnan.com/about-trisha.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.trisha-krishnan.com/about-trisha.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ibtimes.co.in/actress-trisha-gets-engaged-varun-manian-621349

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 April 2016

The languges she speaks is Tamil Telugu and Hindi 198.52.13.15 (talk) 09:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2017

Please do update the career section or else unprotect the page for open editing. 106.76.62.69 (talk) 21:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Wasn't my suggestion clear? To unprotect the page. Protection that denies open editing is warranted only on certain conditions which I very well believe is not the case here. 49.15.81.116 (talk) 16:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

This article has long been a target of block evading accounts and is prone to promotional/paid editing and the addition of unsourced content. The information and sourcing JJMC89 is asking for is the same information and sourcing that you would need to include if you were editing the article directly. If you can't supply it here on the talk page, then it's a strong indication that the protection is working as intended.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Trisha (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116002252/http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=318&catName=MjAxMA%3D%3D to http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=318&catName=MjAxMA==
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151009130200/http://www.sify.com/movies/mankatha-takes-best-opening-of-2011-news-tamil-ljbmvmccafa.html to http://www.sify.com/movies/mankatha-takes-best-opening-of-2011-news-tamil-ljbmvmccafa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Discography

Trisha has sung the following songs for her films:

Year Film Song 2016 Nayagi Bhayam (Tamil)

2016 Nayaki Bhayam (Telugu) K Mythi (talk) 02:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Best movie

Trisha's best movie is 96.. need that updated Sam2907 (talk) 03:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Change "Kamal Hassan" to "Kamal Haasan"

Change Kamal Hassan to Kamal Haasan. Sina101010 (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done (revision 1021418087) ritenerek⋆:) 16:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

"Garjanai (2017 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Garjanai (2017 film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 29#Garjanai (2017 film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2022

https://www.varthashakti.com/will-not-enter-politics-heroine-trisha/ Dileep pati (talk) 07:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 07:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2023

No proper credible source on who addresses her and how is she addressed as South queen. Indiancontribut (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

cited to The Times of India already. the blue numbers in [ ] are citations Cannolis (talk) 20:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)