Talk:Trisha Yearwood

Free image

Can somebody please add a free image to Trisha Yearwood's article. There have been 2 attempts in the past (including myself) and it FAILED. I need someone to upload one PLEASEE!!!Dottiewest1fan (talk) 21:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Someone REALLY needs to get a picture of Trisha up there. This is ridiculous. TheRealBuzzLightyear (talk) 06:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC) trisha never won any emmy see on imdb she never won an emmy sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alicedorajt (talk • contribs) 02:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC) the emmy didn't went to trisha the emmy went to producers and executive producers see on imdb and daytime emmy website thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alicedorajt (talk • contribs) 02:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Trisha Yearwood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090512173017/http://www.opry.com:80/MeetTheOpry/Members.aspx?id=115 to http://www.opry.com/MeetTheOpry/Members.aspx?id=115

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Trisha on "You Can Be A Star"

Seems like this was a significant event in her career. Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article? https://www.rollingstone.com/music/videos/flashback-see-trisha-yearwood-compete-on-you-can-be-a-star-20160317BillVol (talk) 13:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Trisha Yearwood/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 17:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

This is very well written overall. Good to see someone other than myself handling the country music articles for once.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I gave it a couple quick copy edits to fix comma usage, improve sentence flow, and remove overlinking. Also, any number under ten should be written out.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I added a little more information on singles from the album. If you'd like, maybe you can add a couple more reviews into the body somehow (from sources such as AllMusic, Entertainment Weekly, Country Standard Time, etc.) the way I did with Tracy Lawrence). This isn't absolutely mandatory but I think it might lend a little more breadth.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall, a good job here. Again, I'm pleased to see someone other than myself handling the country music articles.