Talk:Troll Airfield/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wackywace ^{converse | contribs} 18:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

---

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

My only reservation about the article is the lack of images, but I understand that it would be incredibly difficult to get a free image of the airfield given its remote nature. I've added some links to external images, though, so I think that should suffice. Overall, for such an obscure airport, this is a detailed and well-written article. Wackywace ^{converse | contribs} 18:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)