Talk:Tropical Depression Five-E (2008)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I made a few copy edits which you are free to revert if I changed the meaning. Everything looks good. There are just a few issues.

Comments

• There are some dead links.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.003.shtml?

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.004.shtml?

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.006.shtml?

• What is "Hill of Ortega, Cabbage" as I have never heard of it?

Everything else looks good. Nicely written!

—Mattisse (Talk) 22:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

The "Hill of Ortega, Cabbage" was lost in translation. I also fixed those dead links. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

• Also, http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.006.shtml? which is still there. Glad you resolved the Cabbage thing!

—Mattisse (Talk) 23:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks hink, I got the last reference then :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

• OK. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Netrual

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations. Good work!

—Mattisse (Talk) 00:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)