Talk:Tropical Storm Amelia (1978)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Hurricane Angel Saki in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 21:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'll be taking this article for review, and should have a full set up comments up within a day. Dana boomer (talk) 21:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

The article looks good to go at this point. I've made quite a few copyedits, though, so please check those and make sure you're happy! I'm going to wait to pass the article until I have your approval on the changes I've made, but at this point I think that's mainly a formality. Please let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer (talk) 17:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I have no problem with the edits you've made. I'm not terribly good with copyedits, so I appreciate your changes. And I have no questions. Thanks for the review! Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply