Talk:Tropical Storm Arlene (1959)

Tropical Storm Arlene (1959) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Tropical Storm Arlene (1959) is part of the 1959 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. It is also part of the Off-season Atlantic hurricanes series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 13, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
April 5, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
July 3, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 20, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Tropical Storm Arlene* of the 1959 Atlantic hurricane season was the earliest storm to ever make landfall in Louisiana?*
Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Arlene (1959)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
In the second paragraph of the lead, you say "Arlene dropped heavy rains totaling up to as it moved" I think you're missing a number here...
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

One tiny little issue with some missing info in a sentence, and the article will be good to go for GA. I'm placing the article on hold until this issue can be fixed. Drop me a note here or on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 19:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I've added that it totaled over two feet in localized areas. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article. Nice job! Dana boomer (talk) 19:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic