Wikipedia

Talk:Tropical Storm Bertha (2002)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Nehrams2020 in topic GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Learn more about this page
Good articleTropical Storm Bertha (2002) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
October 26, 2008Featured topic candidateNot promoted
May 31, 2012Featured topic candidatePromoted
January 22, 2024Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 29, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Tropical Storm Bertha, the second tropical storm of the 2002 Atlantic hurricane season, was one of only 3 tropical cyclones to make landfall on both Louisiana and Texas, with the others being Allison (2001) and Fern (1971)?
Current status: Good article

Rainfall image

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Unfortunately, that's all that's all that's available. The shading one doesn't exist yet. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Assessment

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  1. No Point of View: Easy pass.
  2. Factualality: I'm not sure, but for now pass.
  3. Broad: Yep. Well done here. Pass
  4. Stable: Pass.
  5. Well written: It's hink's work, easy pass.
  6. Images: Pass

As written #5, well written Pass for now, I have no real complaints for it. Congrats.Mitchazenia(7900+edits) 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you're not sure about factual accuracy of articles, you should not be passing them! – Chacor 16:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tropical Storm Bertha (2002)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The fixed isohyet rainfall map would be better for this page, as the contour gradients aren't very visible at small thumbnail sizes. Titoxd(?!?) 03:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 03:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 09:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Storm_Bertha_(2002)&oldid=1203469663"