Talk:Tropical Storm Bertha (2002)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropical Storm Bertha (2002) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Tropical Storm Bertha (2002) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Rainfall image
editUnfortunately, that's all that's all that's available. The shading one doesn't exist yet. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
GA Assessment
edit- No Point of View: Easy pass.
- Factualality: I'm not sure, but for now pass.
- Broad: Yep. Well done here. Pass
- Stable: Pass.
- Well written: It's hink's work, easy pass.
- Images: Pass
As written #5, well written Pass for now, I have no real complaints for it. Congrats.Mitchazenia(7900+edits) 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you're not sure about factual accuracy of articles, you should not be passing them! – Chacor 16:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
editAs part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tropical Storm Bertha (2002)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The fixed isohyet rainfall map would be better for this page, as the contour gradients aren't very visible at small thumbnail sizes. Titoxd(?!?) 03:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
Last edited at 03:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 09:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)