This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is now the topic-of-the-day (today's "featured article") for 09-03-2022. In context, the article states: "In general, damage from Tropical Storm Carrie and its extratropical remnants was light." Gee old weather data is NOT important, especially with almost zero impact. Not really anything I find of human interest or historical significance. This "Climate Change" mentality on mainstream articles in WP is one reason I no longer support WP. I have many other issues, but IMO this weather-related article needs to die and WP needs to offer "featured articles" relevant to something that still impacts today's society. WP has done better in my past experience, and I might contribute again as soon as soon as they get their act together. WP is political, and when the day comes when I feel it is balanced, I will contribute again. Most "featured article"s seem to be picked at random. IMO focus on relevance to today.
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Is there any more impact? The only damage mentioned is a collapsed structure, but that alone wouldn't total to over $1 million (1972 USD). 3 people died from boating accidents, but was it from collisions, rough seas, or something else? All sources need to be converted to {{cite web}}. It needs a good copyedit, but all in all, not too bad for a storm in this time period. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'll cpe soon as for the Cite Web, no dice (too complcated, looks like a confusing mess when seen in edit mode, easy to forget what to put this and that every time). Storm0518:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, but you'll have to learn how to do it eventually. It's not too complicated when you learn each thing. First, <ref name="something>. That's easy. Just pick an easy name, so later on, you can just do <ref name="something"/> without having to put the entire cite web back in. Then, start the template for cite web by putting {{cite web| Simple enough. Next, put the author's name. author=Max Mayfield , for example. If no author is listed for a person's name, list the publisher or organization. For example, author=National Hurricane Center . After the author, put another | , and put the year like this, year=2003 . Then you put the title after another | , like this. title=2003 Atlantic hurricane season summary . After another | , you can either put the publisher if one exists by putting publisher=National Hurricane Center , or skip to the date you accessed the site like this; accessdate=2006-10-23 . After another | , put the url with the url command like this, url=www.nhc.noaa.gov . Then, close it up by adding }} after the url, and </ref> at the end of the reference. All together, that example would look like this. <ref name="something">{{cite web|author=Max Mayfield|year=2003|title=2003 Atlantic hurricane season summary|publisher=National Hurricane Center|accessdate=2006-10-23|url=www.nhc.noaa.gov}}</ref> It seems complicated, but once you try it and get used to it, it's easy. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
"No significant impact" says it is a waste of time to even read it. Thank you WP for posting this trash - unimportant and not relevant even today. DeRavenSay (talk) 00:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
It might be helpful to mention the peak in the lede. I also found it slightly awkward when you said "nearly weakened to tropical depression status". I would prefer reading "minimal tropical storm", or something.
Link baroclinic.
"Operationally, however, it was not recognized as such and assigned the name Carrie until 2200 UTC that day" - try rewording, it hurt my head a bit
"A physically small storm" - physical isn't really needed
Why did it slow and change its movement?
"and hostile conditions surrounding the tropical cyclone inhibited immediate further maturation" - that could be simpler :P
"The local resort industry suffered economical losses due to a portion of the Labor Day weekend seeing adverse weather from the storm, which impacted tourism" - that could also be simpler
All in all, it's a great read. With these few tweaks, I'll be happy to pass the GAN. I would even say that FAC could be in its future... ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
