Talk:Tropical Storm Edouard (1990)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by 12george1 in topic Merge
Merge
editI'm putting this page up for merging. No deaths were caused from the result of this system, there was no damage, and it barely affected any landmasses. TropicalAnalystwx13 18:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just as a counter argument, this was a meteorological oddity; the storm formed unusually far northeast in the basin and featured a highly unusual track, one of a kind actually. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe, but the article is pretty much useless if it isn't improved...Needs major expansion. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk)
- Support Merge - This storm didn't break a record or cause any damages, so basically it did absolutely nothing. All this article is is a Met History. I feel like the article is just...stretching everything to qualify for an article. Darren23Edits|Mail 00:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- I did some copyediting and some fixing (it had some dates wrong), and it's basically a bare-bones article. I agree with merging. There are no advisories that can help pad it out, and there was no impact (unlike Grace or Vince), so unless there is some surprise mudslide event in the Azores, I don't think there is any more info. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:48, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- I am neutral. Ill oppose the merger if more info can be found. My opinion is the same for many similar articles. YE Tropical Cyclone 23:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- I, as the author of this article, will support merging of this article (ironically). Although it was a meteorological oddity (which might have been, but I can't remember, my only reason for creating this article in the first place), no records were broken, and no impact, so it is not really notable. After an extensive search through Google News, I could not find anything else even worth adding to the article. Also, I did not really intend on defending this article if a merge discussion came up for the reasons I just stated; unlike Isidore in this same season, which actually broke a record. Seeing as how there has been no comments in over three months, I thought I should just get this over with.--12george1 (talk) 03:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)