Talk:Tropical Storm Emily (2017)

Is this needed?

While the article looks well written, and we obviously appreciate the effort, Emily only caused $10 million in damage; it didn't have an interesting meteorological history either. Generally, articles are created when content overflows the storm's subsection on the main hurricane season page. What's listed here can easily fit within Emily's subsection. I believe this should be redirected again. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 22:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Considering it quickly formed with little warning and did some sort of mini-Humberto before coming ashore argues against this. Redirecting would just be a waste of effort plus Emily’s section was starting to overflow anyway. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 23:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Honestly I don't have a serious problem either way. 2017 AHS is long enough as is, after all. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

I did put a fair lot of effort into this, and considering storms such as Barry of 2007 have articles, I don't see why Emily of 2017 shouldn't have one. The NHC even noted Emily's formation as "Unexpected", which gives it a very interesting meteorological history (with rapid formation and intensification like Humberto of 2007). Cooper 01:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Considering how long the main season page is and Emily still did $10 million of damage, I think it could stay.Nova Crystallis (Talk) 03:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Also, does anyone have any images or other media that could be put under the preparations and impact section? It would really help the article out. Cooper 20:04, 16 April 2018 (UTC)