Talk:Tropical Storm Henri (2003)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Hurricane Noah in topic WP:URFA/2020
Featured articleTropical Storm Henri (2003) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 16, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 6, 2006WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
July 5, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
December 6, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
March 1, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
February 27, 2023Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 16, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that with the coming of Tropical Storm Henri, parts of Red Clay Creek in Delaware experienced a 500-year flood?
Current status: Featured article

Todo

edit

There's a few places where the punctuation is missing, and your favorite… metrication is still undone. Apart from that, I'm sure the pictures can be improved (I can't be bothered with a MODIS trawl for a while) and surely there are some impact pics?--Nilfanion (talk) 23:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Damn Metric people. Can't you just give up the system and be normal???? :P Just kidding, I got it. Impact pics are going to be hard. Would the pics on this page qualify as fair use, as it's part of the Delaware Geological Survey? I doubt it. However, I did email the Delaware Water Science Center, which is a government agency, if they have Henri pics. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
You know, when the rest of the world uses one system, "normal" can take a whole different meaning... :P Seriously, though, the images would likely qualify as fair use, if they indeed are the only pictures of the damage easily available, as there is a snowball's chance in hell of harming the photographer's pocket in an educational article. That said, a free license (or a license release) would be the optimal solution. Titoxd(?!?) 22:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
LOL, yea, oh well. Good news, I found some .gov pictures. Would these pics from the Delaware Department of Transportation be Public Domain? Unfortunately, it's very small. --Hurricanehink (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Error

edit

There is an error. Instead of, 'Tropical Storm Henri was a weak tropical storm,' it says, 'Tropical Storm Henri was weak a tropical storm'.--69.250.220.191 (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tropical Storm Henri (2003). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Henri (2003). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tropical Storm Henri (2003). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

WP:URFA/2020

edit
  • Duplicate links
  • Alt text needed
  • Small amount of scholarly literature here
  • Unsourced statements
  • Reference formatting issues

Listing at WP:FARGIVEN. NoahTalk 20:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

CCI check not done. NoahTalk 20:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Hurricane Noah: - This one looks fixable, as the additional scholarly stuff appears to be minimal, and the unsourced statements are only three sentences. I've corrected all of the duplinks except those created by template, and can add alt text. Could you note some of the reference formatting issues you saw, and I will try to fix them? My two main concerns with this one are that stormcarib probably isn't reliable and that "The railroad bridges were still being rebuilt as of 2006." could likely use an update if possible. Hog Farm Talk 16:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
There are different date formats being used (looks to mostly be where archive links were added) and some authors for NHC/NOAA agencies are missing middle initials. NoahTalk 17:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Date formats are fixed, although I'd add GoFlorida to the list of sources that need replaced. Any way you'd be able to help with this one? Hog Farm Talk 17:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Between college classes and work, I am pretty busy 5-6 days a week. I am currently working on fixing my own FAs, some of which need extensive updates, during the weekends. NoahTalk 17:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply