Talk:Tropical Storm Karina (2008)
|
Todo
editAgain, very good! --Rose09 Rashmi Next 19:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Very well-detailed and in-depth storm history, despite what a boring and short-lived storm Karina was. Just one nitpick: this sentence, However, it is possible that Karina never reached tropical storm status as it is not noted in the season summary supplied by the National Climatic Data Center did not mention the storm is weird, and I'm not entirely sure of what it's saying. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone
- In the NCDC reference link, it has the season statistics for the EPac storms, but if you look closely, the K named storm is actually Kika, not Karina. It doesn't include tropical depressions so 05E wont be shown. The list is as follows-
- Alma, Boris, Cristina, Douglas, Elida, Fausto, Genevieve, Hernan, Kika, Iselle, Julio, Lowell, Marie, Norbert
- No Karina in the list. Hope that explains it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Kika is the central Pacific name, and Karina is the eastern Pacific name.71.147.51.233 (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- I know, they lump the two basins together, so there should be two "K" names. But there is only Kika. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Karina (2008)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and I should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 20:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Everything looks good, so I am passing this article to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- :D thanks! Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Merge?
editPeople are now putting Odille to merge so know I will put this to merge. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox[ 22:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- I've reverted your merge proposal as a violation of WP:POINT. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Ok. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox[ 22:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Karina (2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtpn21.phnc..txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Merge (2nd)
editThis storm is short-lived and didn't cause any impacts.
@Yellow Evan, Cyclonebiskit, and Juliancolton: pinging the main editors of this article. --219.78.191.189 (talk) 04:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)