Talk:Tropical Storm Karina (2008)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 219.78.191.189 in topic Merge (2nd)
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
October 19, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
January 9, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 12, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Tropical Storm Karina is currently the shortest-lived storm in the 2008 Pacific hurricane season?


Todo

edit

Again, very good! --Rose09 Rashmi Next 19:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Very well-detailed and in-depth storm history, despite what a boring and short-lived storm Karina was. Just one nitpick: this sentence, However, it is possible that Karina never reached tropical storm status as it is not noted in the season summary supplied by the National Climatic Data Center did not mention the storm is weird, and I'm not entirely sure of what it's saying. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone
In the NCDC reference link, it has the season statistics for the EPac storms, but if you look closely, the K named storm is actually Kika, not Karina. It doesn't include tropical depressions so 05E wont be shown. The list is as follows-
Alma, Boris, Cristina, Douglas, Elida, Fausto, Genevieve, Hernan, Kika, Iselle, Julio, Lowell, Marie, Norbert
No Karina in the list. Hope that explains it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Kika is the central Pacific name, and Karina is the eastern Pacific name.71.147.51.233 (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know, they lump the two basins together, so there should be two "K" names. But there is only Kika. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Karina (2008)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and I should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 20:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Everything looks good, so I am passing this article to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

:D thanks! Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge?

edit

People are now putting Odille to merge so know I will put this to merge. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox[ 22:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted your merge proposal as a violation of WP:POINT. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox[ 22:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Karina (2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merge (2nd)

edit

This storm is short-lived and didn't cause any impacts.

@Yellow Evan, Cyclonebiskit, and Juliancolton: pinging the main editors of this article. --219.78.191.189 (talk) 04:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply