Talk:Tropical Storm Octave (1983)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 21:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Guess I will be doing my first GA review. There shouldn't be much to fix, since most are fixed from the first GA review. Expect the review to start soon.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Pretty good already.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   What needs to be fixed has been fixed. But "t" in "tropical cyclones portal" needs to be capitalized.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All of them are reliable.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I'm sure you can add some pictures of damage in Arizona.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Nice job. Good luck with the 1983 PHS GT.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)