Talk:Tryphon, Respicius, and Nympha
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Tryphon Zarezan page were merged into Tryphon, Respicius, and Nympha on 15 February 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Saint Trifon page were merged into Tryphon, Respicius, and Nympha on 15 February 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merging "Saint Trifon" and "Tryphon Zarezan" with this article.
editGreat idea; they all deal with the same person. In addition, why not remove Respicius and Nympha from the title, especially since Nympha seems to have no connection to Tryphon other than shared relics and a former common saint's day? St. Julian of Toledo and St. John of God both have the same saint's day, but no one would suggest a joint article for them.--Isidorpax (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
There's also the Tryphon Zarezan article, which seems to be the same Trifon/Tryphon. 192.55.208.10 (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- I merged both those pages into this one. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 15 February 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. There is no support other than the nom for the proposed move. Splitting Saint Tryphon into a separate article doesn't have consensus either. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 14:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
– This article is currently about three saints that have no connection to each other except for having the same feast day (formerly). The section about Respicius and Nympha is totally unsourced. I propose this article to be solely about St. Tryphon and Respicius and Nympha be removed from the article. If someone has somesources about Respicius and Nympha, we may create new article (or two) about them. --Relisted. Number 57 13:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC) Vanjagenije (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose as proposed Instead split off Saint Tryphon into a separate article. A small summary can be left here. This article would then be converted into an article on the formerly joint feast day. The history of this article is the history of joint coverage, and not specifically Tryphon, and the remaining redirect does not make sense redirecting to a Tryphon-only article. Therefore, this article should be rewritten to cover the period when the feast days were the same, with short summaries on each Saint, redlinking the saints missing articles. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 05:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. Respicius is said to have been a companion of Tryphon, so there's a connection there. Nympha is entombed with them. There are lots of references for Respicius and Nympha; I added one. Peter Flass (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Having a common feast day may be a slightly weak reason for combining people, but it's not completely invalid, it's not as if the article is too long. PatGallacher (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.