Talk:Tsilhqotʼin Nation v British Columbia
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 September 2020 and 3 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AllieFran, Sarahrizvi20, Little.fishy.123. Peer reviewers: Valerie N Fox, AmadineB, Wabasca, Smalltowns23, Sajmal19, Adev04!.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
the tonda mccharles article is just wrong
editthe write-up under "aboriginal title" is what is correct.
the kind of land sovereignty that activists want to assign to aboriginal title cannot be awarded judicially, but rather must be arrived at via treaty. the crown ultimately owns ALL land in canada, including that parceled under "fee aboriginal". only unceded land outside of a treaty gets the potential for allodial treatment. see the nisga'a agreement for an example of what you're actually looking for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.179.229.215 (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)