| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Tu Wei-ming → Tu Weiming – Relisted for further input. Jafeluv (talk) 18:22, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
As per WP:NC-ZH. and also Tu Wei-Ming → Tu Weiming Chinese names should follow the convention set out with the removal of the hypen. The article list publications without the hypen in the name said. Takamaxa (Talk) 05:55, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting case. WP:NC-ZH is irrelevant here since the subject is an American, has published largely in English, and has an academic career almost exclusively based in the US. Google Scholar has 2830 results for Tu Wei-ming ("Tu Wei-ming" -"Tu Weiming") versus only 1030 for Tu Weiming ("Tu Weiming" -"Tu Wei-ming") However, the subject's own website uses "Tu Weiming". — AjaxSmack 01:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Agree. Tending to oppose on the grounds of Google Scholar. But in view of the subject's own preference, wavering. Is less than a 3:1 ration enough to go with scholar? Relist perhaps? Andrewa (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support: "Tu Weiming" is what the author preferrs to style his name as per his own website and the name as it appears on his publications than it make sense to change it.--Michaela den (talk) 12:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.