Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 September 2018 and 21 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rgalinat.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 6 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rc4230.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

NYT article

edit

Good source, particularly on the U.S. vs. China politics:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/health/for-intrigue-malaria-drug-artemisinin-gets-the-prize.html For Intrigue, Malaria Drug Gets the Prize By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

--Nbauman (talk) 23:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Natural Science

edit

The article states "first Chinese receiving the Nobel Prize in natural sciences", but other Chinese scientists have received the prize in Physics which is a natural science. --vossman (talk) 16:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Vossman is right, so this needs to be corrected. For example, the article on Chen-Ning Yang says he was born to Chinese parents in mainland China in 1922, shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1957, and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1964. Although he won the Nobel Prize while living and working in the United States, the only citizenship he had held up to that point was Chinese. I'll correct the lede to note that Tu Youyou was the first Chinese woman to win a Nobel Prize (in any category), arguably a more interesting fact anyway. 153.31.113.21 (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

More recent picture of the subject of article?

edit

The article starts with a photo of the subject of the article with her teacher in 1961. (a) Can we find a more recent picture? (b) as she is a Nobel prize winner in her own right can we find a photo of just her? thanks! mgaved (talk) 16:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Background section awkward?

edit

The Background section needs to be integrated into Research, or at the very least moved to somewhere that would make more chronological sense. Sheephunt2000 (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tu Youyou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

Hi! I think you've done a fantastic job flushing out the information you're going to use to draft your wiki article. I like that you've established corrections that need to be made to the document and have created specific subject sections with research points. It seems to be moving in a cohesive direction and you've focused on a variety of topics to cover. Good luck with the rest of your article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adogra1 (talkcontribs) 04:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply