Talk:Tuck School of Business/Archives/2016


I've just reverted to the featured version from December 2007, as the article was in a ridiculous state for a featured article. All criticism had been removed, the lead consisted of self-sourced self-praise, there was peacockery in various sections. People can go to the school's website to read that stuff, it's not appropriate for Wikipedia. Of course it's a problem that the featured version is old; I'm hoping people will add genuine updates of fact (not renewed peacockery). Bishonen | talk 10:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC).