Talk:Tucker-class destroyer
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tucker-class destroyer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Tucker-class destroyer has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
 | Tucker-class destroyer is the main article in the Tucker class destroyers series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
 | This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Draft, c. 2005
editI made this up from Fitzsimons & navsource; I accept these spex as correct. Trekphiler 01:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
| Hull number and name | Laid Down | Launched | Commissioned | Builder | Fate | params bgcolor="#FFFF" |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DD-57 Tucker | 9/11/14 | 4/5/15 | 11/4/16 | Fore River (Quincy, MA) | CG.23 25/3/26, renamed DD-57 1/11/33 for new construction, stricken 24/10/36 and scrapped | |
| DD-58 Coyningham | 27/7/14 | 8/7/15 | 21/1/6 | William Cramp Ship Building Co. (Philadelphia) | CG-2 7/6/24, renamed DD-58 1/11/33 for new construction, stricken 5/7/34 and scrapped | |
| DD-59 Porter | 24/8/14 | 26/8/15 | 17/4/16. | William Cramp Ship Building Co. (Philadelphia) | CG-7 7/624, renamed DD-59 1/11/33 for new construction, stricken 5/7/34 and scrapped | |
| DD-60 Wadsworth | 23/2/14 | 29/4/15 | 25/7/15 | Bath Iron Works (Bath, ME) | stricken 7/1/36 and scrapped | |
| DD-61 Jacob Jones | 3/8/14 | 29/5/15 | 10/2/16 | New York Shipbuilding Co. (Camden, NJ) | torpedoed U-53 off Scilly Is. 6/12/1917 | |
| DD-62 Wainwright | 1/9/14 | 12/6/15 | 12/5/16 | New York Shipbuilding Co. (Camden, NJ) | CG-24 2/4/26, stricken 5/7/34 and scrapped | |
| DD-63 Sampson | 15/4/15 | 4/3/16 | 27/6/16 | Fore River (Quincy, MA) | stricken 7/1/36 and scrapped | |
| DD-64 Rowan | 10/5/15 | 23/3/16 | 22/8/16 | Fore River (Quincy, MA) | decommissioned 19/6/22, stricken 7/1/36 and scrapped | |
| DD-65 Davis | 7/5/15 | 15/8/16 | 5/10/16 | Bath Iron Works (Bath, ME) | CG-21 25/3/26, stricken 5/7/34 and scrapped | |
| DD-66 Allen | 10/5/15 | 5/12/16 | 24/1/17 | Bath Iron Works (Bath, ME) | decommissioned reserve Philadelphia 3/28, recommissioned 23/8/40, stricken 1/11/45 and scrapped | |
| DD-67 Wilkes | March 11 1915. | May 18 1916 | November 10 1916. | William Cramp Ship Building Co. (Philadelphia) | CG-25 25/3/26, stricken 5/7/34 and scrapped | |
| DD-68 Shaw | 7/2/16 | 9/12/16 | 9/4/17 | Mare Island Navy Yd (San Francisco) | collision troopship Aquitania 9/10/1918, CG-22 25/3/26, stricken 5/7/34 and scrapped |
The Tucker-class of destroyers in the United States Navy were built by the Fore River Shipbuilding Company and Bath Iron Works. Commissioned in 1915 and 1916, they served in World War I. They were similar to the O'Brien-class with the same 21" torpedo tubes.
Jacob Jones was the first US destroyer sunk in enemy action. The surviving ships, with the exception of Wadsworth, were transferred to the United States Coast Guard to be part of the Rum Patrol. By 1936, all five ships were sold for scrap.
Sources
edit- Fitzsimons, Bernard, General Editor. The Encyclopedia of 20th Century Weapons and Warfare, Volume 23, p2526, "Tucker". London: Phoebus, 1978.
- http://www.navsource.org/archives
!style="color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;"| |!colspan="2" align="center" style="color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;"|General Characteristics
| |
| Displacement: | 1090-1110 tons (normal) |
| Length: | 96.09m (315'3") oa |
| Beam: | 9.1m (29' 11") |
| Draft: | 3.2m (10' 5") max |
| Machinery: | steam turbines and cruising turbines, two shafts |
| Power: | 17,000 shp |
| Speed: | 29.5 kts |
| Range: | |
| Complement: | 99 |
| Armament: | 4" (102mm)/50cal guns (4x1); 8 53cm (21") TT (2x4) |
| Aircraft: | None |
- As a follow up to the above draft, Sampson and all those after her were part of the Sampson class and not the Tucker class. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tucker class destroyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria. I have to say that I think this article is genuinely excellent and would support it at FAC as is if it came up there.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- My only (minor) suggestion, is to give the number of sailors killed on Jacob Jones in that ship's synopsis.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Good point. I added it there (and in the lead of USS Jacob Jones (DD-61), upon which this summary was based). — Bellhalla (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- My only (minor) suggestion, is to give the number of sailors killed on Jacob Jones in that ship's synopsis.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. One of my fastest GAs, ever! — Bellhalla (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tucker-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070922053451/http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c13/conyngham-i.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c13/conyngham-i.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070922053451/http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c13/conyngham-i.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c13/conyngham-i.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)