Talk:Tuen Mun South extension

Citobun's overkill reverts

To undo the following disruptive reverts User:Citobun has made:

1. In the last paragraph, from In May 2020, the government invited the MTRCL to proceed with ... to In May 2020, the government invited the MTR to proceed with ... (Undo to reinstate the letters "CL" after "MTR" in order to tie in with the source given near the end of the paragraph and to disambiguate between the MTR (the system) and the MTRCL (the company).)
2. Also in the paragraph, from At that time, approximately 60,000 people lived within a {{convert​|adj=on​|500​|metre}} catchment of Tuen Mun South station, while ... to At that time, approximately 60,000 people lived within a 500-metre catchment of Tuen Mun South station, while ... (Undo to reinstate the {{convert}} tag.)

Thanks. 42.200.166.13 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, ScottishFinnishRadish. Is there any particular reason why this shouldn't be done? Ymblanter what do you think? Is there any reason why the current version was chosen? 42.200.166.13 (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

A16 station

To substitute "... tentatively called " '''A16 station''' "." in the last paragraph with "... tentatively called "⁠{{ill​|A16 station​|yue​|%E5%B1%AF%E9%96%8016%E5%8D%80%E7%AB%99}}".". 42.200.166.13 (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Edit requests are not for continuing edit wars. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

I don't quite understand why it would be relevant to the past content dispute. (But yes Citobun editwars with everything. He simply reverts everything altogether as long as there is a tiny bit he doesn't agree.) 42.200.166.13 (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)