Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
A fact from Tulayl appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The lead
editUser:EliasAntonakos and User:Rajoub570: please explain why you are adding "In the late 19th century, Tulayl was one of several villages settled by Algerian migrants under the auspices of the Ottoman Empire" to the lead?
The lead should be a summary, why focus on this? And it is factually wrong; at best it was "re-settled", as according to the 1596 tax-records it had a (relatively) large Muslim population. cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Also; what is the point of replacing a source in English, with the same in Hebrew? This is en.wikipedia, no he.wikipedia, after all? Huldra (talk) 21:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- The lead should summarize all important periods and events in village history, and the migration of Algerians is one of them. I don't know about the sources but why don't just fix them? Rajoub570 (talk) 16:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- You are right about the "re-settled" instead of "settled", I re-added and fixed accordingly. Rajoub570 (talk) 16:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- So, you ar ok with me inserting in the lead of say, Kiryat Ata and Petah Tikva, that they were Muslim Arab cities for much of their existence? Huldra (talk) 20:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)