Talk:Tumble (TV series)

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British / Reality Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force.

Gymnastics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gymnastics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gymnastics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GymnasticsWikipedia:WikiProject GymnasticsTemplate:WikiProject GymnasticsGymnastics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Circus Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Circus. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.CircusWikipedia:WikiProject CircusTemplate:WikiProject CircusCircus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Week 1 Section

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Just gave it a good clean. :) This boy called andrew (talk) 12:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Scoring Chart

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

There is an error in week 5 where Carl and Sita are highlighted in blue as being in the bottom two couples (but not eliminated) but it should be Sarah and Leon

Am not confident enough to edit the chart to get the colours right though !

ChrisInBalham (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The table is correct --MSalmon (talk) 20:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The table is NOT correct.

In week 5 (or column 5 it's not clear if that is a week or something else but I took it to be a week) Carl & Sita are listed as having 63.5 points and highlighted in blue as one of the two lowest scoring teams but who were not eliminated. Their score is not in red text as being the lowest but Peter & Cate and Sarah & Leon on 50.5 are in red text.

Sarah and Leon should be highlighted in a blue box because their score is clearly the (joint) lowest that week - 50.5 being lower than 63.5 - but who were not eliminated.

If Carl & Sita had been eliminated in week 5 then how do they get a score in week 6 and listed as coming 5th???

Therefore the table is not correct.

I'd try and edit the table myself but don;t want to mess it up!

ChrisInBalham (talk) 16:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes but Sarah & Leon did not take part in the vault in Week 5 after the public vote and judges points were added together --MSalmon (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic