Talk:Tumblr Sexyman
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | A fact from Tumblr Sexyman appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 17:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Sans was crowned as "Ultimate Tumblr Sexyman" on the same day that Elizabeth II died? Source: https://kotaku.com/undertale-sans-toby-fox-mob-psycho-100-reigen-arataka-1849512678
- ALT1: ... that the Once-ler from The Lorax was the first Tumblr sexyman? Source: https://www.themarysue.com/tumblr-sexyman-explained/
- ALT2: ... that Sans barely won a tournament for the title of Ultimate Tumblr Sexyman? Source: https://kotaku.com/undertale-sans-toby-fox-mob-psycho-100-reigen-arataka-1849512678https://gaymingmag.com/2022/09/sans-undertale-wins-tumblr-sexyman-2022-bracket/https://www.pcgamer.com/toby-fox-wrote-a-fanfic-to-explain-why-undertales-sans-is-the-ultimate-tumblr-sexyman/ https://www.polygon.com/23344824/reigen-arataka-toby-fox-fan-fic-undertale-sans-tumblr-sexyman
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nannette Hegerty
- Comment: I hope this can be a hook on April 1 if possible.
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Di (they-them) (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
QPQ is good. The link given doesn't verify the Queen Elizabeth II part of the first hook, although the citation in the article verifies it, so it should be fine. First hook is the most interesting imho (especially given that people connected both, although it isn't in the hook), but the concept of Tumblr sexyman probably makes any hook funny. Article is well-sourced. ALT1 could maybe have a link to The Lorax so people can look up the sexyman by themselves. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 01:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing out that the link doesn't verify the Elizabeth claim, I used the wrong link! I meant to use this one. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
absolute jumpscare, thank you dyk.
added this article to my watchlist and i'll try hunting for sources later (on a lainpilled streak rn) . this absolutely deserves to be an FA oh my God. astral ▪️ he/him ▪️ >:3 01:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Origin of term
editThe article states that the concept originated with the Onceler, but I am certain that the term/concept "Tumblr sexyman" was not used at the time. He's just seen as prototypical. So should we clarify when it was popularized? Pondofturtles9 (talk) 00:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Jax from The Amazing Digital Circus
editWould Jax qualify to be added under the Tumblr Sexyman notable examples? Wikipedia heads, give me some resources of citing articles about this. 72.47.21.19 (talk) 19:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- You’d need to have a reliable secondary source that’s independent of the subject and calls him one to add him. Basically this means that it comes from a reputable website that isn’t associated with Gooseworx, Glitch, etc. If you can find that, he could make a good addition! Di (they-them) (talk) 02:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey there,
- I couldn't find anything outside of stuff from Know Your Meme and Newgrounds forum posts by the site's users. I'm not sure if you're familiar with the zeitgeist around mainstream internet culture outlets, but if you are, let me know what outlet websites are usually used for these kinds of citations. 72.47.21.19 (talk) 21:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Typically we use secondary sources such as news articles or papers. Stuff that is written by random online users (like forums) and/or can be edited by anyone (like Know Your Meme) aren’t considered reliable. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Yup! Definitely relevant for wikipedia!
editThis article makes wikipedia be seen as professional and as a serious platform! Thank you! 2A02:8070:6280:6700:D242:153B:F957:6F5C (talk) 02:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. λ NegativeMP1 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- wikipedia is for literally ANYTHING 2601:405:4102:4820:50E2:7BFC:66E4:2A2E (talk) 23:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)