Talk:Tuna as food
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Tuna Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Tuna |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... this is copied from the Wikipedia article on Tuna (see Tuna#As food) and from [[1]], which predates the blog, they may have copied from Wikipedia. This article can be changed but should not be deleted because this needs to be created to mirror Salmon as food. --2601:647:CB02:5034:582B:A6B5:C738:4460 (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae: Hold on a second. I don't understand why I recieved that message. I just created this redirect when I reviewed AfC requests. Do redirects contain copyrighted contents? Are redirects eligible for G11 criteria? Masum Reza📞 20:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: beatcancer2010.wordpress.com/2013/08/27/fish-of-the-week-tuna. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. StudiesWorld (talk) 14:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)