Talk:Tung Chung station
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Citobun in topic Response to formatting / organisational changes
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tung Chung station/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Starting at the concourse level (West exit), there is a major set of concealed stairs (under white metal cover) that go down below the platform level (they are visible under the cover at platform level). Also seem to be accessible by an internal lift from the control room. Where do these stairs go? They are about 30-feet wide - not just for access. Lower level platforms?Temple-of-heavenly-peace (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 16:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Response to formatting / organisational changes
edit@Xeror: My point is that your changes are inconsistent with other Hong Kong MTR articles and WPHK articles more broadly. You can't just swoop in and sloppily make these changes on a few articles on apparently arbitrary grounds. Please discuss at Talk:MTR, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong or a similar venue. Citobun (talk) 09:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Citobun: I have just started making changes and you already jumped in and say that they are inconsistent with other articles. How can it be consistent to other articles if you interrupt my edits in the middle of the progress? You have not provided a single reason to object my changes so far other than pointing to the inconsistency with other articles. Do you agree that for a station article it is more important to provide the description of the current station before its history? Not every article has to begin with history, e.g. vaccine, apple, etc. Secondly, does the random capitalizations of a list of words, which are not proper nouns, need consensus but not grammar, e.g. "Customer Services, Vending machine, MTRShop, Automatic teller machines? Not to mention a brand word such as MTRShop should not appear in a Wikipedia article for general readers without details. A table without complete sentences should be read as separated by colons ":". After a colon, the words are never capitalized. For example: "Connections: bus, light bus", but not "Connections: Bus, light bus". --Xeror (talk) 10:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Xeror: Please don't move the "History" section unless you have consensus to do so. No, I don't agree that it's "more important to provide the description of the current station". That's completely arbitrary reasoning. If you want to make such a sweeping change please find consensus first. Regarding caps, there are in fact no colons and other infoboxes use caps for the first item in each row. There are some examples at Template:Infobox building. They capitalise the first word. Build a consensus before making sweeping changes that seem to be premised solely on your personal preferences. I recommend you do so at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong. Thanks. Citobun (talk) 18:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)