Talk:Tupolev Tu-91

Tupolev Tu-91 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 22, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tupolev Tu-91 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft / Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the Soviet aviation task force.

Military history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 08:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupolev Tu-91/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 17:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 17:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Comments

Is there no free image of the Tu-91 or a schematic of its design that you could find?
- No, but I've added a non-free image
Source for the Nato reporting name Boot?
"It called for building a large number of warships" → "The expansion called for building a large number of warships" to disambiguate between Stalin and the expansion
"It first flew on 17 May 1955" → "The Tu-91 first flew on 17 May 1955"
"Khrushchev replied that" remove "that"
Do we know what happened to the 2 prototypes after the project was canceled?
- Presumably scrapped, but nothing definitive
"consisted on manually tabbed ailerons" → "consisted of manually tabbed ailerons"

@Sturmvogel 66: I've left some comments for the review. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 18:11, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Everything looks good now. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 08:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic