Talk:Turahan Bey/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 01:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    This is awkward: His cavalry breached the recently rebuilt Hexamilion wall on 21/22 May breached and ravaged the interior of the peninsula unopposed. Why is Fall of Constantinople capitalized?
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Need publisher and location for Incalik. Need publisher location for Toynbee, Setton, Nicol, Imber, Fine, Babinger 1992. Need ISBN or OCLC # for Toynbee.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: