This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I see the prod was removed with the addition of a couple of references. I'm still not seeing this article meeting notability guidelines. While the book mention is a step in the right direction, the single paragraph newsletter mention doesn't do much to establish notability, it also is not clear how this reference demontrates that the organization is "politically relevant". The fact that there are zero Google news hits doesn't look good for finding the kind of significant coverage in 3rd party reliable sources that is required.--RadioFan (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
The Rogstad source contains the words "the Turkish Youth Association, which has become politically relevant in Norwegian society" in the abstract linked via the doi. You couldn't get much clearer than that. And there are Google News hits.[1]Phil Bridger (talk) 10:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Non-English sources are fine but you cant expect others to improve the article for you especially if it requires non-English sources.--RadioFan (talk) 13:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
What makes you think that I expect others to improve the article for me? I have absolutely no interest in the subject, apart from not wanting an article on a notable subject to be deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
