Talk:Turtle River–White Otter Lake Provincial Park

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the White Otter Castle is the most popular attraction in the Turtle River-White Otter Lake Provincial Park, even though it is not accessible by road? Source: Ref #3 (Turtle River-White Otter Lake Provincial Park Management Plan: "Though not accessible by road, it is visited year round, via watercraft, aircraft and motorized snow vehicles, by an estimated 5,000 to 7,000 persons annually." / "The most popular attraction in the park is the castle on White Otter Lake.")
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Portillo Cáceres v Paraguay

Created by P199 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Turtle River-White Otter Lake Provincial Park; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @P199: Good article. Though, earwig does report some wp:clop with the Ontario.Ca source, but i'm under the assumption that it's okay since it's a government website. Though if it's not then please fix the clop. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks @Onegreatjoke: for your review. The relatively high percentage is mostly due to the long park name. Every time it is mentioned in the article, Earwig marks it as copying. The few other items flagged by Earwig are just common word combinations, but I feel that these are sufficiently small and common that it is pointless to rephrase. Regards, -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)