Talk:Tuta (email)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... The article is not about the website, but primarily the open-source software package that is recently receiving growing media attention (in credible sources) in the area of information security and Internet privacy (see references from several independent sources - currently added some more). Googling the topic shows enough notability to be included as an encyclopedic topic among other similar projects already present on Wikipedia like ProtonMail or Hushmail (in fact, not many similar notable projects exist and Tutanota is an important contribution in that narrow area of communication privacy). Some more selected credible refs (in the area of information security and internet privacy):

• http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/07/11/tutanota/
• https://www.deepdotweb.com/2015/08/03/which-secure-email-provider-is-the-one-for-you/
• http://www.wired.com/2014/09/oxguard/
• https://gigaom.com/2015/01/06/tutanota-releases-ios-encrypted-email-app-after-notifying-nsa/
• http://www.techspot.com/article/896-secure-email-and-cloud-storage-services/
• http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/analysis/2431763/forty-per-cent-of-it-professionals-now-use-encrypted-email-has-a-tipping-point-been-reached

Selected German articles in notable industry sources:

• http://www.sueddeutsche.de/news/wirtschaft/internet-tutanota-e-mail-verschluesselung-fuer-jeden-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-140908-99-06598
• http://www.pcwelt.de/news/Tutanota_Free_-_neuer_Mail-Dienst_macht_Verschluesselung_einfach-Deutscher_Mail-Dienst-8626705.html
• http://www.heise.de/forum/heise-online/News-Kommentare/Alptraum-fuer-Ueberwachungssoftware-Hersteller-Wikileaks-veroeffentlicht-E-Mails-von-Hacking-Team/Tutanota-de-dabei/posting-20987892/show/

Selected research papers:

• http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.08554.pdf --Finleyh-IT (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Extra sources

Here are some extra sources which can be added:

• https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/07/11/tutanota/
• https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/tutanota
• https://gigaom.com/2015/01/06/tutanota-releases-ios-encrypted-email-app-after-notifying-nsa/
• https://cointelegraph.com/news/tutanota-provides-stupid-easy-email-encryption
• http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Productivity-Sauce/Tutanota-A-Promising-Privacy-Focused-Email-Service
• https://www.ccn.com/secure-email-provider-tutanota-open-source/
• http://observer.com/2017/02/email-privacy-act-kevin-yoder-lavabit-protonmail-tutanota-vera-sendrblock/
• https://www.forbes.com/sites/leemathews/2017/05/10/secure-email-provider-attacked-with-500k-newsletter-sign-ups/#399ced7a1981

UaMaol (talk) 14:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Mainstream RS coverage?

RS = WP:RS = Wikipedia:Reliable sources

Steue (talk) 02:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

There's literally one RS in the article. If the article were cut down to RSes, it'd be a sentence. Is there any proper coverage? Quite a lot of what's listed above isn't. Can anyone be bothered to put it into the article? - David Gerard (talk) 11:07, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

A weird sentence.

The article reads: "In 2014, the software was open-sourced and can be reviewed by outsiders on GitHub"

Even we replace "can" with "could" the problem remains, because we don't know what happened after 2014, and what the current status is. 85.193.228.103 (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Okay, let's be clear: Since 2014, the software has been open-sourced. See my edit. 85.193.228.103 (talk) 20:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Name change from Tutanota to Tuta

Following today's rebranding to Tuta, I have changed the name of this article to "Tuta (email)" and the Wikidata item to "Tuta". I also adjusted the official website on both (EN) article and Wikidata, but I have not edited any other mentions of Tutanota. Not really sure how much history to retain, after all, it has been Tutanota until now. MichielN (talk) 22:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)