Talk:Tuvalu at the 2016 Summer Olympics

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tuvalu at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Should be Tuvalu has: Tuvalu have ever sent, Capitalize Ministry of Education.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Combine the Beijing and China wikilinks into a single wikilink for Beijing, China, per WP:OVERLINK or whatever it is, same with Rio.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Keep a common date format for the citations. Make sure you have an access date, and when you get the access date verify the material the source is supporting. In citations like this one, the name of the website is not needed in the title: "iaaf.org – Top Lists Include the author names for articles like the Washington Post article. Combine refs 6 and 7. A few of the citations are redirects. Fix those with what they are supposed to be. The top lists citation redirects to a list of 60 m participants still.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Try using the word 'only' less in the caption, it is used three times as of now.
	7. Overall assessment.

• Kees08 Done all except redirect in rio2016, Cyberpower678 told me he'll add it to InternetArchiveBot's repo of dead links. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 18:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
• Kees08 All done. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 21:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

@DatGuy: Just those last couple things and we will be good to go. Kees08 (talk) 03:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)