Talk:Twinkle (EP)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Twinkle (Girls' Generation-TTS song) page were merged into Twinkle (EP) on 26 June 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Plagiarism
editA lot of the information on this page - and the description for TaeTiSeo is copied directly from AllKPop's articles. Can someone make this less... er... plagiarized, please?
Distribute Label
editDistribute Label in US and Worldwide is not iTunes, is SM Entertainment. You can find it on the US iTunes Pages (http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/twinkle/id523113063). ℗ 2012 SM Entertainment <--This is it. So I change it.
Baby Steps
editSomething should be added about Baby Steps being an original song by Varsity Fanclub. Just unknown (talk) 10:00, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Twinkle (Girls' Generation-TTS song)
editInformation about the song is on the EP article, and all that's left is teaser info and a MV synopsis. I think a merged article makes sense because there isn't enough info about the song for two articles. Random86 (talk) 21:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Disagree : The article on the song has more information about the song than the info on the article of the EP. Maybe you can help to find more information put on the article on the song? --Deoma12(Talk) 15:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I just took out some unnecessary stuff from the song article, and the only thing that is not already in the album article is the MV synopsis. I don't think there is any reason why these articles shouldn't be merged. The info about the song's genre and influences is taken from an article / press release discussing the album. WP:NSONG states, "Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created." It also states, "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album."
I know K-pop editors are used to songs having separate articles, but most of the time this is unnecessary and against Wikipedia guidelines. WP:SONG even says "Most songs do not merit an article". --Random86 (talk) 21:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I just took out some unnecessary stuff from the song article, and the only thing that is not already in the album article is the MV synopsis. I don't think there is any reason why these articles shouldn't be merged. The info about the song's genre and influences is taken from an article / press release discussing the album. WP:NSONG states, "Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created." It also states, "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album."
- Agree - agreed with Random86. There's nothing here that shows notability of the song itself. If there were more critical analysis, music reviews, or exposure from 3rd parties, I could see it staying - this song has none of that. Evaders99 (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Merge Per WP:NSONGS. HĐ (talk) 07:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Disagree : The article on the song has more information about the song than the info on the article of the EP. Maybe you can help to find more information put on the article on the song? --Deoma12(Talk) 15:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 06:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)