Talk:Two-body problem (career)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability
editWhat a pointless article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.165.136 (talk) 13:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Bizarre
editThe list of solutions is a bizarre and pointlessly tedious piece. 160.39.63.50 (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Simplify
editOh come on, "Simplification to one body problem" is GOLD I tell you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.157.126 (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Solved
editLooks like universities have solved this problem by not giving anyone any tenure at all. Nothing but adjuncts as far as the eye can see, unless you've got special connections.68.173.61.38 (talk) 22:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Not just academia....
editThe two-body problem is not just a problem of academics. It exists in any professional/specialised career, such as medical careers, legal, financial, ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.44.117 (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed, it feels weird reading this talking about universities when the concept applies to any married couple with careers. Does that need a source for alteration? 187.122.124.255 (talk) 18:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but in industry the spouse has to stand on his own legs to get a job. In big academia, the school will create a position just for a trailing spouse. It is a corrupt situation. 172.56.21.14 (talk) 03:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Inane
editI have never seen a worse Wikipedia article.<ref>me, today</ref> I like to saw logs! (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 06:35, 20 February 2018 (UTC)