Talk:Two-hander

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Sherlock_Holmes_(1984_TV_series)#Theatre|The Secret of Sherlock Holmes]] The anchor (Theatre) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Comments

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I.... think this page would be better suited as a re-direct to Wiktionary. Does anyone else agree? Murdersaurusrex (talk) 04:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed TygerKrash (talk) 16:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

No agreement, but this article needs expansion and inline citations.--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Almost" instances

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What makes something an "almost" two-hander? Is it being mostly a two-hander but with a minor appearance from a third person (or more)? Or is it a three-hander? I ask because "Episode 7202" has been added, which I had already decided not to add myself because it's a definite three-hander with three main cast, and I decided it didn't fit in. Should it be removed? Any others that should be removed? Anemone Projectors 10:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Home and Away recently had a two-hander, which featured an appearance by a baby at the end. I'd consider that an "almost" two-hander, but "Episode 7202" shouldn't be listed. Maybe there could be a separate section about three-handers? Not sure if it's notable enough for a separate article. - JuneGloom07 Talk 16:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

National variety of English

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't see anything tagging the article for a specific variety and can't think of a particularly convincing argument that there is a strong national tie. Thus, we should be defaulting to the first established.

The earliest versions of the article do not use anything characteristic in the text (programme vs. program, handling of group nouns, etc.) and there is inconsistent use of date order in the references section. The first thing I can see that pops up in the actual text of the article is "programme" in 2011.[1] It's been there ever since. - SummerPhD^v2.0 19:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic