Talk:Two Rivers, Wisconsin

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

WALRUS's edits

edit

These edits [1] seem generally trivial, non-notable, and original research - three things we try to avoid when writing good encyclopedia articles. I've reverted twice, and they shouldn't be re-inserted unless in better accordance to WP's standards. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

To the individual who removed my edits... why? Who are you to deem what is appropriate, and what isn't? Factual information about the city seems appropriate to me. 9/14/06 10:22 AM - WALRUS

While I can't speak for other editors, the factualness of an entry is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for inclusion in an encyclopedia. For example, the statement "Joe Smith used to run a gas station in Two Rivers, but doesn't anymore" might be true, but it is not notable for an encyclopedia article about the city. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. (That said, some of your contributions have been included in the article in a more appropriate fashion) --ZimZalaBim (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem. You've allowed my stuff twice now. I have no beef with you. While some of my edits may have been unimportant, a lot of it was worthy. So thank you for putting them back up. Hopefully it won't be removed by others again. 9/14/06 11:13 AM - WALRUS

History

edit

Does this town have no history? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:490E:292:5D68:C066:5882:D738 (talk) 23:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Two Rivers, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply