Talk:Two for the Knight/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grk1011 (talk · contribs) 15:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Pseud 14: I'll be reviewing this for you. Expect comments within the next day or so. Grk1011 (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Infobox and lead

• Image licensing checks out
• Add concert chronology for Brian McKnight to the infobox

Added

• "McKnight and Velasquez performed individual shows," -> maybe something like "McKnight and Velasquez performed individual solo sets," as the event itself is the show.

Revised as suggested

• replace "McKnight and Velasquez" in last sentence with "the singers"

Done

Background and development

• "but did not materialize" <- a missing word in there

Tweaked this part

• ^ the above sentence is also a bit of a run-on

Refer to above comment

• For the scheduling conflict, does the ref actually say it was a conflict or is it just establishing that he was doing something else around the same time? The dates themselves do not overlap.

Revised this bit to improve flow with the previous statement, without mentioning that it was a conflict, only that he ended up appearing in the latter's show instead.

• Both quotes check out in their respective refs
• Add quotation marks for "Go the Distance"

Done

Synopsis and reception

• "movie theme songs" -> film songs? I recall a guidelines saying not to use "movie". Consider alternatives.

Done

• "1970s, and was followed" -> "1970s, which were followed"

Done

• "McKnight's part began with" -> "McKnight's solo part then began with"

Done

• Remainder of quotes check out

Set list

• Add quotation marks to "To Reach You"

Done

• It might be helpful to add a sentence to the top to identify Regine's, Brian's, and the duets.

I've split the setlist per artist, similar to co-headlining setlist formats. Indicated where a duet was performed.

References

• Ref 1: Can you explain the connection between the Manila Bulletin and flickr? How are we supposed to know?

I've tried sourcing out alternative links, but there is nothing available online, only the flickr transcription of the newspaper entry. In an FAC source review, I recall that we can remove the link from the ref (not the entire ref, just link), as some articles just aren't available online. Lmk if that works.

• Checked all references: they're newspaper scans with the exception of the above and the liner notes, which were accepted in good faith.
• Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows 10.7% -> unlikely violation, just brings up the quotes and name strings.

External links

• I don't find the Live Nation link helpful. It's a bit advertisey.
• You could check some similar articles to find more categories.

I've removed the external link section completely, as it is not a requirement.

Discussion

Hi @Pseud 14: not much to fix. Good job with this! Grk1011 (talk) 18:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

@Grk1011: - thanks for taking up this review. I have actioned all comments above. Let me know if I may have missed anything or require further changes. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Looks good. Made a couple minor fixes. Passing now! Great job. Grk1011 (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.