Talk:Ty Segall
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 July 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --209.158.240.93 (talk) 23:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
He is a great musician, making strides in indie music, and it's important people know about him.
- Wikipedia is not designed to make people aware about musicians, it is for article about people that are notable and whose notability can be verified by reliable sources. The current article does not indicate any notability, either generally or in the music field. GregJackP Boomer! 00:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Ty segall is a rising popular act in the world of garage and punk --98.87.10.147 (talk) 02:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- He still needs to be notable, and the article does not show that. GregJackP Boomer! 02:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...
Ty Segall is an actual musician, I'm listening to him right now, and SOME amount of an entry is better than nothing. They play his music frequently on satellite radio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.249.165.159 (talk) 06:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have no doubt that he is an actual musician, however that does not entitle him to a Wikipedia entry. He has to be notable and as a musician he has to meet the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO. The article, as written, does not do that. GregJackP Boomer! 06:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --68.14.85.6 (talk) 07:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Segall is one of the biggest names in today's indie scene
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... The article clearly shows how he is a prolific cult musician. It is also the most efficient way to find all of Ty Segall's musical projects, and I feel it would be wrong to delete this page. --92.41.38.205 (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Should NOT be deleted because...
editI had never heard of the guy before. After reading a great review of hius last album om Pitchfork (http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/16744-slaughterhouse/)I wanted to learn more, what better place to go than Wikipedia? He is obviously of enogh significance as to earn an article on W!
11:13, 12 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariusbakke (talk • contribs)