Talk:Tyisha Miller

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Camelia.boban in topic Article title

this page is being targeted for deletion.

edit

minutes after this page was created, it was marked for deletion with a rather derogatory remark: "this is not a memorial site".

this event received significant media attention, triggering investigations and aggressive demonstrations. It involved extreme violence, probable criminal misconduct and symbolizes relevant issues of social justice. The victim's name is now recognizable and associated with the event, more than justifying an encyclopedic entry. Please support and improve this page so that it does not fall victim to censorship.

--APDEF (talk) 06:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

I deleted one of the last sentences; there's no proof of criminal misconduct and to say the arrest of 20 protestors who did violate the law is hypocritical since none of the officers were not charged is prejudicial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.113.112 (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Removing neutrality tag

edit

There appears to be no discussion for a tag which was placed in the middle of the text in November, 2011. I am going to be WP:BOLD and remove it. If someone sees fit to replace we should iron these concerns out through discussion.Boogerpatrol (talk) 23:23, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Article title

edit

According to current Wikipedia conventions, the title should probably be Death of Tyisha Miller... AnonMoos (talk) 22:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Can you link the particular naming convention? Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Not sure where the formal policy is (something about people whose notability is only due to a single event), but compare Death of Mark Duggan, Death of Jean Charles de Menezes, Shooting of Michael Brown, etc. AnonMoos (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your suggestion and the links. I would support a move, but more discussion from other editors is needed. If we don't get any comments in the next week we can set up a RFC to attract more attention. – S. Rich (talk) 17:57, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
What about changing the name in Shooting of Tyisha Miller, as is in all the other cases? --Camelia (talk) 20:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Omission

edit

The article doesn't mention the main question that many people had, which was why the matter couldn't have been handled as a medical problem, instead of being escalated to a quasi-SWAT situation... AnonMoos (talk) 22:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Having some familiarity with the news stories at the time, my impression was that they simply sought to break open the car window in order to retrieve the weapon and rescue Miller. That step was necessary before the medics could be brought in. Moreover, no tactical equipment was brought out, so it certainly was not a SWAT matter. Just officers doing what they thought best for Miller, while seeking to go home at the end of the shift, rather than to the ER. If the SWAT angle has reliable sourcing to support it, I'd certainly like to see what it says. – S. Rich (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
It seems fairly clear that when they saw the gun, there was an immediate knee-jerk reaction in which the possible medical problem, or the idea of helping her, was instantly demoted to 17th-place priority, and they focused on the gun issue to the near-exclusion of everything else, and went onto twitchy hair-trigger alert status as if being threatened (despite the complete lack of evidence of any aggressive intentions on her part, and the fact that the gun was never in her hand). There were probably a variety of ways they could have prudently handled the situation without allowing the presence of the gun to completely dominate their thought processes and override all other considerations... AnonMoos (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Riverside County's local newspaper (The Press-Enterprise) had many stories about the incident and aftermath. (The P-E received the 1968 Pulitzer Prize for its public service journalism.) Archives are on microfilm. – S. Rich (talk) 17:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tyisha Miller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply