Talk:Type (designation)

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Binksternet in topic Narrow scope

Narrow scope

edit

Although the article's title simply mentions "designation" and the introduction notes that "Many other nations use the word 'Type' to designate products in a series" with no further qualification, the article is devoted to a discussion of (1) military weaponry (2) from three countries only. Either this article should be greatly expanded (admittedly, a huge job) or its title changed to a more restrictive scope, such as "Type (military designation)" or "Type (weapons)". The latter may be more appropriate. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Expansion seems to me the answer. As for the article name, I took Mark (designation) as the model. Binksternet (talk) 16:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply