 | Type 41 torpedo boat has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 19, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Type 41 torpedo boat/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 20:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Parsecboy (talk) 20:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Not much to complain about here:
- I don't have Groner in front of me at the moment, but I'd guess he has a line drawing that you could claim fair use on.
- To tell the truth, I never think about fair-use images any more as I've gotten so much grief over them in the past. Either Gröner or Whitley has a sketch that I'll add once I clear the stuff off the top of my scanner.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Argh, don't get me started on needing to clean off the scanner... Parsecboy (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- To tell the truth, I never think about fair-use images any more as I've gotten so much grief over them in the past. Either Gröner or Whitley has a sketch that I'll add once I clear the stuff off the top of my scanner.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Watch ENGVAR - I spy a couple of "metre"s
- Damn copy-paste.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Nice work. Parsecboy (talk) 20:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. And thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)