Talk:Type 88 75 mm AA gun

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 172.190.184.240

Loose statement about utility

edit

This article statement is misguided in the sense of representing AA as being either effective or not "considered capable of handling any targets". If it's a matter of altitude, that should be made clear. 98.210.208.107 (talk) 02:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's also a matter of time frame. When adopted, the Type 88 was a good weapon, but by the end of the war it was found to be almost completely lacking.--172.190.50.79 (talk) 22:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
"Lacking" what? Boneyard90 (talk) 23:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
How about lacking the ability to deal with the performance of 1940s aircraft. LACKING THAT!--172.190.184.240 (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply