Talk:Typewriter/Archives/2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago by John Maynard Friedman in topic layout


'Notes' section should be removed

In my opinion, the 'Notes' section of this article should be removed if no notes are going to be added to it as in my opinion it is pointless to include an empty section in the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Agreed,   Done Martin of Sheffield (talk) 11:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

layout

"The QWERTY keyboard layout, developed for typewriters, remains the standard for computer keyboards.[5]" -- this is only true of at most some Latin-type keyboards. Cyrillic -letter keyboards as well as those for other alphabets are different. Kdammers (talk) 04:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

It isn't even true for most Latin types. See AZERTY and QWERTZ for starters. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

trigrams?

"The Russian layout, for instance, puts the common trigrams ыва, про, and ить on adjacent keys" - I don't know if this is true for typewriters, but on the hp laptop with Russian/Latin layout I am using to type this, it is not true unless there is a hidden shift to get them. Kdammers (talk) 04:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Typewriter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)