Talk:Typhoon Irving (1982)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by HickoryOughtShirt?4 in topic GA Review
![]() | Typhoon Irving (1982) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 16, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Irving (1982)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 19:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Pass
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review
editLead
edit- Can tropical depression be Wikilinked?
- Sure - I'll link it at the first mention of the TC page. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Meteorological history
editin early Septembe 1982.
Should say SeptemberBy early on September 4
, wording- Don't see the problem here. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Could
By
be removed? I think that's what tripping me up. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)- Probably not but I re-worded the sentence slightly. Better? YE Pacific Hurricane 01:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Could
- Don't see the problem here. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
However
(see WP:EDITORIALIZING)- Looking at the context, I don't see how this contrast is editorializing. "in part because the subtropical ridge was anticipated to remain anchored north of the system. However, this ridge proved to be weaker than expected and Irving tracked slowly northwestward instead." The source say the storm move in a certain direction but it moved in a different direction instead. That's an indisputable contrast. YE Pacific Hurricane
A Hurricane hunter aircraft
. Please maintain consistency with capitalization. It was earlier spelt asafter a Hurricane Hunter aircraft
with a capital H.
Impact
editSchools were closed
can this be merged with the previous sentence?Twenty-three were wounded.
Please spell as 23 and try to merge with following sentence- Doesn't really fit in with any other sentence and I don't want to start a sentence with a number. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- I re-read the MOS and it says generally, but you do not have to so we can leave that.HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Doesn't really fit in with any other sentence and I don't want to start a sentence with a number. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
However
(see WP:EDITORIALIZING)- This I can sorta see; changed. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
References
edit- Please add "via Lexis Nexis (subscription required)" to reference #11 if this is how you accessed it.