Talk:Typhoon Mitag (2002)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Hurricanehink in topic GA Review
 | Typhoon Mitag (2002) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Typhoon Mitag (2002) is part of the 2002 Pacific typhoon season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.png)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Mitag (2002)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 19:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- "the first super tyhoon" - typo/misspelled word
- Oops! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- "resulting in an islandwide power outage and" - Not sure if there is a mistake here, but I think it would read better as "resulting in islandwide power outages and"
- Well, it was one power outage islandwide, it wasn't multiple outages. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- "Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)[nb 3];[1] the" - Shouldn't both the note and reference appear after the semicolon?
- Yea, oops. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- In the MH, why do you alternate between 1-minute and 10-minute sustained wind speeds? Is it because JWA uses 10-minute and JTWC uses 1-minute?
- Yep, just mentioning speeds from both of them. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- "in the FSM, producing a a wind gust of 76 km/h (47 mph) - Double word
- Blargh. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- "and portions of the town was flooded 1.5 m (5 ft)" - Shouldn't it be "and portions of the town were flooded 1.5 m (5 ft)"?
- Yep. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Be sure to link the publishers and some of the authors of the references.
- K, should be good! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)