Talk:Typhoon Nida (2009)
 | A fact from Typhoon Nida (2009) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png)
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Typhoon Nida (2009) was copied or moved into 2009 Pacific typhoon season with this edit on 26 May 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
New global image, cropping needed
editHi. Here are the global satellite images of Nida and Tip, compared. However, the Nida image should be cropped, as it is a full-globe image that does not show the storm well at thumbnail size. Please go to the commons image to crop it. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 15:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
.png)
Like this? (I also accidentally uploaded a blank file under the name "Nida 2009 new", please delete it.) VeryPunny 04:28 UTC, 01 December 2010 (UTC)
ahh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.154.100.199 (talk) 02:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Typhoon Nida (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtpq31.pgum.tcp.pq1.txt
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtpq31.pgum.tcp.pq1.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Merge
editNida caused no deaths and damages. --219.79.250.146 (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Cyclonebiskit and Jason Rees: you may discuss about it. --219.79.250.146 (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- I personally would be very surprised if Megi did cause no damages as you assert.Jason Rees (talk) 06:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Merge proposal to 2009 Pacific typhoon season
editLike the previous discussion says, no deaths and no damages, and the storm has no significant media coverage whatsoever as far as I know. luis 💬 01:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support merge, ordinary out-to-sea WPAC super typhoon. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 07:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support Other than being a Cat5, Nida isn't really notable here. ChessEric 15:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support merge, as typhoon had no impact and was little noticed by the media. Also, the key details of the storm are fully covered in the season article. Drdpw (talk) 22:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)