Talk:Typhoon Olive (1952)

Latest comment: 11 years ago by CycloneIsaac in topic GA Review

Todo

edit

Definetly not a C, more storm history and impact (if found) --Yue of the North 00:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This was 1952. I'd honestly be surprised if any further information could be uncovered. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
There might be rainfall information for this system from NCDC. Let me see if Wake reported rainfall during this time frame. If so, I'll update the rainfall maxima page one evening late this week. I disagree about this article not reaching C class criteria, however. It is well-referenced, has the proper wikipedia article format, and has enough content for C class. One could argue B class, as it unlikely that any bulk of significant information (or missing sections) will be added from now on. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
There is a general consensus for this article being C-class so I've upped it to C-class :) Cyclonebiskit 18:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

More info

edit

Pages 158-160 of this document. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Olive (1952)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 02:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not good Cy10. I gave it a copyedit, so I think we are in the right ballpark. YE Pacific Hurricane 02:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done with fixes, just need to do some nbsp-ing.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 04:21, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply