Talk:Typhoon Vera/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 22:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

GA criteria

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

The article has not been the subject of disruptive editing since at least 2010. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All images presently used in the article serve relevant purpose within, and are all public domain, so fair use is not a problem. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After reading through this article, I believe it satisfies the GA criteria. It is well-written and organized, with a few sparse grammatical or tonal glitches eliminated, it is well-referenced with a large number of reliable third-party sources, covers all encyclopedically relevant aspects of its topic, and maintains a neutral tone. Congratulations! "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2015 (UTC)